MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773870984 · doi:10.1071/rdv30n1ab133

133 In Vitro Embryo Production from Oocytes Collected from Non-Supertimulated Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) Following Maturation In Vitro Using Portable Incubators

2017· article· en· W2773870984 on OpenAlexaffabout
M. P. Cervantes, Gregory P. Adams, M. Anzar, J. M. Palomino, Gabriela F. Mastromonaco

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsToronto ZooUniversity of GuelphAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaL'Alliance BoviteqGreoUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbryo cultureIncubatorBiologyEmbryoAndrologyIn vitro maturationFollicleOocyteEmbryogenesisAnatomyEndocrinologyMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was done to determine the feasibility of in vitro embryo production in wood bison during the anovulatory season, without ovarian superstimulation or follicle wave synchronization, to simulate collection conditions in a wild or field setting. The experiment provided the opportunity to compare embryo development using 2 different maturation media and incubator systems. The cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC) were collected by transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration during May from non-superstimulated bison. Compact COC were allocated to 2 groups and matured in standard maturation medium using a portable gassed incubator, or in commercial medium using a portable non-gassed incubator. In the former (Standard), the COC were placed in a round-bottomed tube containing TCM-199 medium with 5% calf serum, 5 µg mL-1 LH, 0.5 µg mL-1 FSH, and 0.05 µg mL-1 gentamicin, and the tube was placed in a portable incubator with 5% CO2. In the latter (Commercial), COC were placed in a round-bottom tube containing the commercial medium (Boviteq, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada), and placed in a portable incubator without CO2. After 24 h of maturation, oocytes were fertilized in vitro (Day 0) in Brackett-Oliphant medium at 38.5°C in a conventional incubator with 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Presumptive zygotes were cultured in CR1aa plus 5% calf serum, at 38.5°C and in 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2 and high humidity. Cleavage was recorded on Day 3 and embryo development was recorded on Day 7. Cleavage and transferable embryo rates (calculated from the total number of oocytes submitted to IVF) were compared between groups by chi-squared test. No difference in cleavage rates was observed between Standard and Commercial treatment groups [68.1 (32/47) v. 79.2% (57/72), respectively; P = 0.25], nor in morula plus blastocyst rates on Day 7 (36.2 v. 45.8%, respectively; P = 0.39). However, the rate of transferable embryos (grade 1 and grade 2) on Day 7 was higher in the Commercial group (38.9 v. 12.8%; P < 0.01). Of the COC in the Commercial group, a higher number of morula plus blastocyst were observed to be compact good COC (>3 layers of cumulus cells) than compact regular COC (1-3 layers of cumulus cells) (66.7 v. 31.0% respectively; P < 0.05), along with a higher number of transferable embryos on Day 7 (60.0 v. 23.8%, respectively; P < 0.05). In conclusion, wood bison oocytes collected during the anovulatory season from non-superstimulated, non-synchronized bison and matured in vitro using portable incubators were competent to develop to the morula and blastocyst stages following IVF and culture. These results are important for future plans that require transporting oocytes from remote collection sites to the IVF laboratory, particularly with respect to the effectiveness of commercial maturation media which does not require CO2 supplementation. Research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207