MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773897921 · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aa9fd8

Locally preserved <i>α</i>   →   <i>β</i> phase transition in natural radiation-damaged titanite (CaTiSiO <sub>5</sub> ): evidence from laser-induced photoluminescence and dielectric measurements

2017· article· en· W2773897921 on OpenAlexafffund
Tobias Beirau, Dawid Murawski, Harald Behrens, Ekhard K. H. Salje, Lee A. Groat, Ronny Kaden, Herbert Pöllmann, U. Bismayer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNuclear materials and radiation effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftLeverhulme Trust
KeywordsTitanitePhotoluminescenceDielectricMaterials scienceImpurityPhase transitionCondensed matter physicsAmorphous solidPermittivityDielectric spectroscopyPhase (matter)FerroelectricityAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryOptoelectronicsCrystallographyPhysicsComposite materialPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In situ temperature-dependent laser-induced photoluminescence and dielectric measurements provide new evidence for the local occurrence of the α → β phase transition near 500 K in the preserved crystalline parts of natural radiation-damaged titanite (sample E2335 with ~24% amorphous fraction, containing Fe and Al impurities). Photoluminescence spectroscopic measurements show an anomaly in the vicinity of 500 K. The temperature-dependent evolution of the real part of the electrical conductivity ( σ ) and the real ( ε ′) and the imaginary ( ε ″) part of the complex dielectric permittivity ( ε * ) of titanite have been measured at various AC frequencies (~1.2–96.8 kHz). Despite the masking and smearing effect of impurities and defects, the temperature-dependent behaviour of ε ′ and ε ″ around the transition temperature of the investigated natural titanite E2335 shows a remarkable similarity to that of the synthetic end-member material (see Zhang et al (1995 Phys. Chem. Miner . 22 41–9)). This study indicates the suitability of photoluminescence and impedance spectroscopy for the detection of phase transitions, even in heavily disordered systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Condensed MatterSame topicNuclear materials and radiation effectsFrench-language works237,207