MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773999114 · doi:10.1071/rdv30n1ab3

3 Animal Protein-Free Semen Extender for Fixed-Time Insemination of Beef Cows

2017· article· en· W2773999114 on OpenAlexaffabout
S. X. Yang, E. M. Zwiefelhofer, Gregory P. Adams, M. Anzar

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtenderSemenSemen extenderArtificial inseminationSpermInseminationAndrologyBiologyAnimal scienceSemen collectionSemen cryopreservationElectroejaculationSperm motilityYolkReproductive technologyCryopreservationChemistryFood scienceMedicinePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current semen cryopreservation protocols include the use of animal products, such as egg yolk, in semen extenders, which raises important biosecurity concerns related to the transmission of infectious agents. Therefore, there is a need for alternatives to animal proteins in semen extenders. Cholesterol-cyclodextrin (CC) has been used as an adjunct in semen extenders to facilitate the delivery of exogenous cholesterol into sperm plasma membranes. The purpose of this study was to determine the fertility potential of semen extended with cholesterol of plant origin (PhytoChol, Wilshire Technologies, NJ, USA) in a fixed-time insemination program for beef cows. Semen was collected by electroejaculation from mature Simmentals bulls (n = 4 bulls, 4 replicates/bull) and analysed using computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA). Ejaculates from different bulls with =200 × 106 sperm mL-1 and =60% total motility were pooled. The pooled ejaculates were distributed into 3 treatments and diluted to 50 × 106 mL-1 in Tris-citric-acid base extenders containing either egg yolk (20% vol/vol egg yolk, control), 0.5 mg of CC per mL of semen, or 1.0 mg of CC per mL of semen. Glycerol (7% vol/vol) was added to each extender. Extended semen was loaded into 0.5-mL straws and frozen to –196°C. Post-thaw sperm motility was analysed using CASA. Ovulation was synchronized among multiparous beef cows using 1 of 3 protocols: (1) 5-day intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (PRID) and prostaglandin F2a PGF2a) treatment on the day of PRID removal (n = 37 on random days of cycle); (2) oestradiol + progesterone treatment and 7-day PRID followed by PGF2a on the day of PRID removal (n = 37 on random days of cycle); or (3) PGF2a alone (n = 19 on Day 7 to 9 from ovulation). Cows were treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and assigned randomly to be inseminated with 1 of the 3 semen treatments 72 h after PGF2a treatment. Ovulations were confirmed and pregnancies were diagnosed 28 to 35 days after insemination by ultrasonography. Post-thaw sperm motility was compared among extenders by analysis of variance. Pregnancy rates were compared among groups by generalized linear mixed model. Total motility (52 ± 3%, 59 ± 3%, and 62 ± 7%) and progressive motility (47 ± 3%, 54 ± 3%, and 58 ± 6%) did not differ among the egg yolk, 0.5 mg CC, and 1.0 mg CC extenders, respectively. There were no differences in pregnancy rates among synchronization groups; therefore, data were combined to compare the effects of semen extender. Four cows were excluded due to improper synchronization treatment. Pregnancy rates of cows inseminated with egg yolk (n = 31), 0.5 mg CC (n = 31), and 1.0 mg CC (n = 27) semen were 32, 74, and 52%, respectively (P < 0.05). Fertility in cattle inseminated using semen extended with cholesterol of plant origin has not been previously reported. We conclude that plant cholesterol may be used to replace animal proteins (egg yolk or milk origin) in bovine semen cryopreservation. Research supported by grants from the Saskatchewan Agricultural Development Fund, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, and Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207