Control of a flexible-joint robot using a stable adaptive introspective CMAC
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes an adaptive control for a rigidlink, flexible-joint robot using the Cerebellar Model Articulation Controller (CMAC) and the backstepping method, which is a suitable method when joints are underdamped and exhibit a large amount of flexibility. A previously proposed robust weight update method, deemed the introspective method, is placed into a Lyapunov-stable framework. In the introspective method, each local CMAC cell measures the output error in its own domain and over the domain of several sequentially activated cells on the same CMAC array. The cell then votes on whether it appears its previous weight update has reduced this error or not. The sum of all votes from the activated cells determines whether weight updates continue. In order to ensure uniformly ultimately bounded signals, a robust CMAC operates in parallel using a conservative e-modification weight update. Simulations with a two link flexible-joint arm show significantly improved performance over e-modification and a model-based LQR control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it