La géographie du Nord dans l’oeuvre de Maurice Constantin-Weyer : de la réalité à l’imaginaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Nord est très présent dans l’oeuvre de Maurice Constantin-Weyer, notamment dans son «épopée canadienne». Mais de quel Nord s’agit-il, puisque le Nord, c’est un très vaste espace, mal délimité, aux frontières changeantes? Le Nord correspond notamment à des rigueurs du climat et du paysage, à de grands espaces inoccupés, à la nature sauvage, à un grand silence blanc… Chez Constantin-Weyer, l’action se déroule-t-elle vraiment dans le Nord? L’auteur y a-t-il transposé son expérience du Nord ou est-ce le fruit de son imaginaire et de ses nombreuses lectures? Constantin-Weyer a vécu au Canada, dans la région de Saint-Claude (Manitoba), de 1903 à 1914. On peut sans aucun doute affirmer que Constantin-Weyer n’a pas du tout voyagé dans les espaces de son oeuvre de fiction, malgré toute la légende qui l’entoure dans les milieux littéraires en France, mais il a fait entrer l’Ouest et le Nord canadiens dans la littérature d’expression française.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".