MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774089436 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2017.8217539

An application of a finite element controller map for speed control for saturated induction motors

2017· article· en· W2774089436 on OpenAlexaff
F. Lftisi, Glyn George, Mohammad Azizur Rahman

Bibliographic record

VenueIECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersOffice of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Induction motorController (irrigation)MATLABFinite element methodElectronic speed controlLinear induction motorDigital signal processingComputer scienceControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Computer hardwareVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel Finite Element Controller Map (FECM) method for the speed control of a saturated induction motor (IM) drive is presented in this paper. The newly developed algorithm is based on approximate functions in finite elements, which are expressed according to the nodal values of output response of the IM drive. The map complexity depends on the nodes assigned within a discrete element. The proposed FECM improves dynamic responses, and is designed by assigning a simple shape function to avoid computational burden. The complete controller scheme incorporating the FECM algorithm for an IM drive is developed in MATLAB/Simulink. The proposed FECM algorithm is experimentally implemented in real time using a DSP-DS1104 control board for a laboratory induction motor. The simulated performances of the proposed FECM are found to be not very sensitive to parameter variations. These simulation results are investigated and compared with a conventional PI controller, when they are subjected to changes to command speed and parameters variation, particularly at low speeds. The simulation and experimental results are provided to verify the effectiveness of the proposed control strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics SocietySame topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207