Monocle: Interactive detail-in-context using two pan-and-tilt cameras to improve teleoperation effectiveness
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Robot teleoperation, such as for search and rescue, uses multiple specialized cameras (e.g., wide environmental and sharp narrow views) to aid in task awareness. Simple display techniques, such as tiling, require ongoing mental mapping between the views; cameras that pan or tilt exacerbate the problem as the inter-view relationship changes. The detail-in-context technique bypasses this mental mapping requirement by providing a single integrated feed showing all cameras, with detail overlaid within the context. However, how this can be adapted to for robot teleoperation with multiple pan-and-tilt cameras has not yet been demonstrated. We present Monocle, an interactive detail-in-context teleoperation interface that integrates a pan-and-tilt narrow-angle first-person view into a wide-angle behind-robot view; operators can move the Monocle around a scene to obtain more resolution when and where needed. Evaluation results demonstrate Monocle's feasibility and show that it can help operators complete search and rescue tasks more effectively in comparison to simple solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it