MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774156306 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_4

Improved Diagnosis and Care for Rare Diseases through Implementation of Precision Public Health Framework

2017· review· en· W2774156306 on OpenAlexaff
Gareth Baynam, Faye L. Bowman, Karla J. Lister, C. E. Walker, Nicholas Pachter, Jack Goldblatt, Kym M. Boycott, William A. Gahl, Kenjiro Kosaki, Takeya Adachi, Ken J. Ishii, Trinity Mahede, F. Ellis McKenzie, Sharron Townshend, Jennie Slee, Cathy Kiraly‐Borri, Anand Vasudevan, Anne Hunsaker Hawkins, Stephanie Broley, Lyn Schofield, Hedwig Verhoef, Tudor Groza, Andreas Zankl, Peter N. Robinson, Melissa Haendel, Michael Brudno, John S. Mattick, Marcel E. Dinger, Tony Roscioli, Mark J. Cowley, Annie Olry, Marc Hanauer, Fowzan S. Alkuraya, Domenica Taruscio, Manuel Posada de la Paz, Hanns Lochmüller, Kate Bushby, Rachel Thompson, Victoria Hedley, Paul Lasko, Kym Mina, John Beilby, Cynthia J. Tifft, Mark R. Davis, Nigel G. Laing, Daria Julkowska, Yann Le Cam, Sharon F. Terry, Petra Kaufmann, Iiro Eerola, Iréne Norstedt, Ana Rath, Makoto Suematsu, Stephen C. Groft, Christopher P. Austin, Ruxandra Draghia‐Akli, Tarun Weeramanthri, Caron Molster, Hugh Dawkins

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcGill UniversityChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic healthHealth careStakeholderPopulationGovernment (linguistics)DisadvantagedHealth equityHealth policyMedicinePublic relationsPolitical scienceEnvironmental healthNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in experimental medicine and biologySame topicGenomics and Rare DiseasesFrench-language works237,207