MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774203950 · doi:10.17118/11143/11535

Approche comparative du règlement des conflits armés au Moyen-Orient (Gaza et Liban) : à quelles conditions retrouver la stabilité?

2008· article· fr· W2774203950 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Fady Fadel

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de droit Université de Sherbrooke · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMiddle East Politics and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

des conflits armés (2008-09) 39 R.D.U.S. au Moyen-Orient (Gaza et Liban) peines de prison à la suite d'opérations de libération et de résistance à l'occupant israélien.Dans ce contexte intervient l'opération du Hezbollah en juillet 2006 qui consiste à enlever deux soldats israéliens au-delà de la Ligne bleue, à l'intérieur du territoire israélien, en vue de provoquer un échange par la suite avec des prisonniers libanais en Israël, ce qui a appelé d'ailleurs à une condamnation par le Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU 5 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0120.009
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0100.010
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de droit Université de SherbrookeSame topicMiddle East Politics and SocietyFrench-language works237,207