Liberté de religion ou égalité entre les sexes? La Cour suprême du Canada se prononce sur un cas de divorce
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Encore une fois en l'espace de quelques années, la Cour suprême canadienne s'est occupée d'une question relative à la religion avec le jugement Bruker c. Marcovitz. Par une majorité de sept contre deux, elle a établi que les accords qui ont un contenu religieux ne sont pas exempts d'examen judiciaire et a condamné un individu de religion juive à payer des dommages-intérêts à son ex-épouse pour n'avoir pas tenu son engagement contractuel de concéder le divorce religieux. Le jugement Bruker c. Marcovitz qui fait l'objet de la présente note est un exemple de la tendance, montrée par la Cour suprême canadienne dans ses arrêts les plus récents dans la matière, à mettre l'accent sur la dimension multiculturelle de la liberté de religion, plutôt que sur la liberté de religion en tant que droit individuel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".