MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774316107 · doi:10.26443/crae.v44i1.32

The School Teacher and the Art Museum: A Multi- Case Study of Online Canadian Art Museum Teacher Resources | L’enseignant scolaire et le musée des beaux-arts : une étude de cas multiples des ressources en ligne des musées des beaux-arts pour les enseignants

2017· article· en· W2774316107 on OpenAlex
Julie Etheridge

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Review of Art Education / Revue canadienne d’éducation artistique · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Education and Development
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe artsHumanitiesSociologyArtVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: This study seeks to better understand the online resources and lesson contents that Canadian art museums offer secondary school art teachers. The author conducted a content analysis of online teacher resources and lessons developed by four Canadian art museums during 2016. By looking at the various resources through the lens of a high school teacher/researcher, the author highlighted how these resources presented differences in curriculum and fostered self-reflection in students. The relationship between the art museum and the school teacher was examined. To better understand this relationship, further research on online resources developed by museums to increase pedagogical possibilities should be conducted.Key Words: Teacher; Museum; Online Teaching Resources; Art EducationRésumé : Cette étude vise une meilleure compréhension du contenu des leçons et des ressources en ligne mises à la disposition des éducateurs artistiques du secondaire par les musées des beaux-arts canadiens. L’auteur a analysé le contenu des ressources et des leçons en ligne offertes aux enseignants en 2016 par quatre musées des beaux-arts canadiens. En examinant les diverses ressources du point de vue d’un enseignant/chercheur au secondaire, l’auteur met en évidence les différences curriculaires de ces ressources et l’autoréflexion suscitée par ces ressources chez les étudiants. La relation entre le musée des beaux-arts et l’enseignant scolaire y est également étudiée. Il faudrait, pour mieux comprendre cette relation, mener d’autres recherches sur les ressources en ligne développées par les musées dans le but d’élargir l’éventail pédagogique.Mots-clés : enseignant; musée; ressources en ligne; éducation artistique

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it