Approches dominantes du décrochage scolaire : un regard critique des écrits récents au Québec et ailleurs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans des societes ou la reussite sociale depend de plus en plus fortement du niveau scolaire, du diplome obtenu, le decrochage scolaire devient une question preoccupante. L’abandon des etudes ou la non-obtention d’un diplome peut conduire au chomage, a l’exclusion sociale. Eleves, parents, enseignants, administrateurs scolaires, chercheurs, etc., sont donc interpeles par l’ampleur des repercussions de ce phenomene sur le cheminement scolaire de l’eleve ainsi que sur son eventuelle insertion socioprofessionnelle. Bien plus, la persistance des inegalites - de genre notamment - suscite une attention particuliere, notamment chez les chercheurs. Cette recension des ecrits vise a rendre compte des approches dominantes sur la question au Quebec et ailleurs. Si celles-ci presentent l’interet d’etablir des relations entre ces differences de carriere scolaire et les determinismes personnels, familiaux, sociaux et scolaires, contribuant ainsi, a la reponse politique et institutionnelle face au decrochage scolaire, il convient tout de meme de poser sur elles un regard critique et de proposer quelques prospectives en recherche. Mots-cles : Decrochage scolaire, abandon scolaire, determinismes personnels, familiaux, sociaux et scolaires, Quebec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".