Annellosporium nemorosum gen. et sp. nov., an annellidic anamorph with phylogenetic affinities to the genus Daldinia (Xylariales)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During a survey of fungi occurring in soil from swift fox dens in a zoo enclosure in Alberta, Canada, a free-living xylariaceous mitosporic fungus was repeatedly isolated and is herein described as Annellosporium nemorosum gen.et sp.nov.The fungus is characterized by mononematous, dichotomously branched conidiophores with termini bearing groups of 1-3 cylindric, smooth to minutely roughened, enteroblastic, percurrently proliferating, annellated conidiogenous cells that produce sub-globose to obovate conidia with attenuated, flattened basal ends.Phylogenetic analysis of the β-tubulin region indicates A. nemorosum has strong phylogenetic affinities to the teleomorphic genus Daldinia (Xylariaceae, Xylariales), and is included in a clade with those Daldinia species known to produce Nodulisporium-like anamorphs with enteroblastic conidiogenesis, rather than the holoblastic conidiogenesis typical of true Nodulisporium species.A teleomorphic state was not observed, but is expected to be Daldinia loculata-like, given the close affiliation between this species and A. nemorosum that was revealed by phylogenetic analyses of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of rDNA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".