MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774536142 · doi:10.4000/belphegor.1035

J. Andrew Deman, The Margins of Comics: The Construction of Women, Minorities, and the Geek in Graphic Narrative

2017· article· en· W2774536142 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Chris Reyns-Chikuma

Bibliographic record

VenueBelphégor · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComics and Graphic Narratives
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeekComicsNarrativeGender studiesHistoryArtSociologyLiteratureMedia studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comme l’explique Deman dans son introduction, il y a de nombreuses raisons qui font que les comics ont mis si longtemps pour être reconnus comme un art aux USA et au Canada (Deman est canadien et enseigne à l’université de Waterloo, en Ontario). Il cite alors plusieurs facteurs donnés par divers auteurs. Parmi ceux-ci: le format, puisque les comics étaient jetables (Sabin); la popularité souvent présentée comme équivalente à la vulgarité, et l’escapisme (Groensteen); la crainte que l’image pu...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.010
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBelphégorSame topicComics and Graphic NarrativesFrench-language works237,207