Image Classification Using RapidEye Data: Integration of Spectral and Textual Features in a Random Forest Classifier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Information on crop types derived from remotely sensed images provides valuable input for many applications such as crop growth modeling and yield forecasting. In this paper, a random forest (RF) classifier was used for crop classification using multispectral RapidEye imagery over two study sites, one in north-eastern China and one in eastern Ontario, Canada. Both vegetation indices (VIs) and textural features were derived from the RapidEye imagery and used for classification. A total of 20 VIs, categorized into two groups with and without the red edge (RE) band in an index, were calculated. A total of eight types of textural features were derived using four different window sizes from both the RE and the near-infrared bands. To reduce redundancies among the VIs and textural features, feature selection using the principal component analysis, correlation analysis, and stepwise discriminant analysis was performed. Results showed that the overall classification accuracy was improved by ~7% when the RE indices were combined with the five spectral bands in classification, as compared with that using the five bands alone. When textural information was included, the overall classification accuracy increased by ~6% compared with that using the band reflectance alone. Furthermore, when all the features (band reflectance, VIs, and texture) were used, the overall classification accuracy increased by ~12% compared with that using only the band reflectance. The RF importance measures showed that the RE reflectance was important for classification, as indicated by the high importance for the triangular vegetation index, transformed chlorophyll absorption in reflectance index, and green-rededge normalized difference vegetation index. The gray-level co-occurrence matrix mean is the most useful for classification among the textural features. The study provides a means to feature extraction and selection for crop classification from remote sensing imagery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".