MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774571784 · doi:10.1109/jstars.2017.2774807

Image Classification Using RapidEye Data: Integration of Spectral and Textual Features in a Random Forest Classifier

2017· article· en· W2774571784 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Huanxue Zhang, Qiangzi Li, Jiangui Liu, Xin Du, Heather McNairn, Catherine Champagne, Taifeng Dong, Mingxu Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMultispectral imageRandom forestRemote sensingPrincipal component analysisRed edgeContextual image classificationLinear discriminant analysisSpectral bandsNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceMultispectral pattern recognitionReflectivityClassifier (UML)Support vector machineStatistical classificationComputer scienceMathematicsGeologyHyperspectral imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Information on crop types derived from remotely sensed images provides valuable input for many applications such as crop growth modeling and yield forecasting. In this paper, a random forest (RF) classifier was used for crop classification using multispectral RapidEye imagery over two study sites, one in north-eastern China and one in eastern Ontario, Canada. Both vegetation indices (VIs) and textural features were derived from the RapidEye imagery and used for classification. A total of 20 VIs, categorized into two groups with and without the red edge (RE) band in an index, were calculated. A total of eight types of textural features were derived using four different window sizes from both the RE and the near-infrared bands. To reduce redundancies among the VIs and textural features, feature selection using the principal component analysis, correlation analysis, and stepwise discriminant analysis was performed. Results showed that the overall classification accuracy was improved by ~7% when the RE indices were combined with the five spectral bands in classification, as compared with that using the five bands alone. When textural information was included, the overall classification accuracy increased by ~6% compared with that using the band reflectance alone. Furthermore, when all the features (band reflectance, VIs, and texture) were used, the overall classification accuracy increased by ~12% compared with that using only the band reflectance. The RF importance measures showed that the RE reflectance was important for classification, as indicated by the high importance for the triangular vegetation index, transformed chlorophyll absorption in reflectance index, and green-rededge normalized difference vegetation index. The gray-level co-occurrence matrix mean is the most useful for classification among the textural features. The study provides a means to feature extraction and selection for crop classification from remote sensing imagery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207