MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774619925 · doi:10.1521/jsyt.2017.36.3.20

A Galveston Declaration

2017· article· en· W2774619925 on OpenAlex
Faye Gosnell, Mark McKergow, Blaine Free Moore, Tanya Mudry, Karl Tomm

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Systemic Therapies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeclarationStatement (logic)Pluralism (philosophy)PsychologySociologySocial psychologyEpistemologyPolitical scienceLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present “A Galveston Declaration,” which is intended as a statement of values shared by family therapists and the broader community of collaborative practitioners. In the preface, the authors describe the process by which they created this declaration, as well as its purpose. The authors declare that family therapy is experiencing another significant transformation, not unlike a previous historical shift from first- to second-order family systems therapies. The authors propose a statement of shared values, thematized within four categories: (1) pluralism, (2) flux, (3) opening space, and (4) responsibility. The authors invite colleagues and peers to sign on to support or otherwise respond to the declaration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it