MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774765386 · doi:10.1071/rdv30n1ab121

121 Comparing Two Superstimulation Protocols Prior to Ovum Pick-Up in Dromedary Camel

2017· article· en· W2774765386 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T. Ararooti, A. Niasari-Naslaji, K. Razavi

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Diversity and Health Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFollicular phaseIntramuscular injectionFollicleInternal medicineMedicineEndocrinologyAnimal scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to investigate different superstimulation protocol before oum pick-up (OPU) to increase the number of follicles suitable for puncture in dromedary camel. Follicular waves were synchronized using two intramuscular administrations of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue (Alarelin, 25 µg, Vetaroline®, Aburaihan, Iran) 12 to 15 days apart. Two days after the second GnRH (Day 0 of experiment), donors were assigned into 2 groups (n = 6 in each group) receiving different amounts of eCG (Pregnecol®, Bioniche, Canada; intramuscular) and FSH (Folltropin-V®, Bioniche, Canada; intramuscular). Groups 1 and 2 received the respective amounts of eCG (3000 and 2000 IU) and FSH (200 and 160 mg). The eCG was administered as a single dose at the start of superstimulation and FSH was delivered twice daily in decreasing doses (group 1: 40, 30, 20, 10 mg; group 2: 30, 20, 20, 10 mg) between Days 0 and 3. On Day 4 of superstimulation, camel received 2 doses of prostaglandin F2a analogue (25 mg of dinoprost tromethamine; Lutalyse®, Pfizer, Belgium; intramuscular), 12 h apart and were examined by ultrasonography in the morning to record ovarian follicles (=4 mm in diameter). Data were analysed using GLM procedure followed by Tukey in SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Data were presented as mean ± SEM. On Day 4 of superstimulation, the average follicle diameter was similar in group 1 (6.4 ± 0.16 mm) and group 2 (7.4 ± 0.33 mm; P > 0.05). The total number of follicles were different between group 1 (15.5 ± 1.75) and group 2 (4.7 ± 0.71; P < 0.001). Total number of follicles =6 was significantly greater in group 1 (6.2 ± 0.95) than in group 2 (1.2 ± 0.60; P < 0.05). Total number of follicles >6 mm in group 1 (9.3 ± 1.20) was greater than in group 2 (3.5 ± 0.76; P < 0.01). In conclusion, superstimulation with eCG (3000 IU) and FSH (200 mg) could provide a relatively good number of follicles for aspiration in OPU program of dromedary camel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.939

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicAnimal Diversity and Health StudiesFrench-language works237,207