MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774844186 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v10n1p140

Factors that Influence the Rate of Unemployment in Indonesia

2017· article· en· W2774844186 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Erna A. R. Puspadjuita

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnemploymentEconomicsIndustrialisationLabour economicsWageUnemployment rateTertiary sector of the economyUrbanizationWage rateElasticity (physics)EconomyMacroeconomicsEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research was aimed at analyzing the effect of urbanization, industrialization, labor force level, the elasticity of labor force and minimum regional wage rate in Indonesia. The analysis technique used were descriptive and multiple linear regression. The result on α = 5% shows that the labor force variable was significant to unemployment level in Indonesia. Industrialization shows a positive effect and non-significant to unemployment level, it means that the capability of industrial sector is lower in reducing unemployment compared with agricultural sector and service sector. The elasticity of labor force is negative and non-significant to unemployment sector. The result of regression shows that the elasticity of labor force is non-significant to unemployment level. The variable of minimum regional wage rate shows negative effect and non-significant to unemployment level means that the wage rate is not invisible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and FinanceSame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207