MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774849664 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-3048-0_4

Password Less Authentication

2017· book-chapter· en· W2774849664 on OpenAlexaff
Morey J. Haber, Brad Hibbert

Bibliographic record

VenueApress eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicUser Authentication and Security Systems
Canadian institutionsNorthern Ontario Academic Medicine Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPasswordComputer scienceAuthentication (law)Computer securityContext (archaeology)Process (computing)Internet privacyGeographyOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While there is a movement to remove passwords and traditional credentials from the authentication process, and many emerging solutions are claiming to do so, the unfortunate fact for any of these technologies is still tied to the binary nature of all computing systems. You either have been authenticated, or you have not; the outcome is always Boolean. While you can apply context-aware scenarios to limit access based on other criteria to minimize risk, the user has still been authenticated with yes or no criteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.009
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1160.081

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApress eBooksSame topicUser Authentication and Security SystemsFrench-language works237,207