An Active Deployable Tensegrity-Ring Footbridge System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Structural engineering is evolving towards tuned performance structures through the integration of active control. Tensegrity structures are cable-truss structures that can combine actuators, sensors and structural elements. A tensegrity-ring system that has been found viable for an active deployable footbridge application is presented in this paper. Active cables are employed to simultaneously adjust several degrees of freedom and enhance performance through independent actuation. Numerical results were validated experimentally on a near-full-scale actively controlled physical model. However, predefined actuation steps do not always result in the same position. Therefore, the configuration of the model is improved through a sequence of correction-control commands that are tested and selected according to direct measurements. The two-stage strategy is able to generate effective cable actuation for the mid-span connection of the deployable tensegrity-ring footbridge system and it is likely to be applicable for a range of complex structures where exact modelling of true behavior is difficult.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it