A new soft computing‐based approach to predict oil production rate for vapour extraction (VAPEX) process in heavy oil reservoirs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract There are vast resources of heavy oil and bitumen reservoirs in the Western Canadian Basin. For many of them up to 95 % of reserves still remain in place, and by considering the increase in future energy demand these abundant resources can be considered as potential sources for future years. Recently, solvent‐based heavy oil recovery methods such as vapour extraction (VAPEX) have gained attention due to the potential environmental and economic assets over thermal processes. Due to the complexity of the mechanisms associated with the solvent injection process (i.e. diffusion and gravity drainage processes), such models are incapable of accurately predicting the production rate during the VAPEX process. In this study, the artificial neural networks (ANN) technique is utilized to tackle the limitations that analytical methods encounter while predicting the complex relationships, where there is uncertainty, imprecision, and partial truth. Hence, in the first phase of the research a comprehensive experimental study in two large‐scale, visual rectangular VAPEX models was carried out by utilizing various injection solvents. Based on an extensive literature review and experimental results, the drainage height, solvent type, permeability, porosity, and heavy oil viscosity were considered as the inputs of the model to predict the heavy oil production rate as the output of the model. After trying different training scenarios, it was found that the back‐propagation learning algorithm can be successfully used to predict the ultimate recovery factor after implementing the VAPEX method in the heavy oil system of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".