A polyalanine antibody for the diagnosis of oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy and polyalanine-related diseases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eighteen severe human diseases have so far been associated with trinucleotide repeat expansions coding for either polyalanine (encoded by a GCN repeat tract) or polyglutamine (encoded by a CAG repeat tract). Among them, oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD), spinocerebellar ataxia type-3 (SCA3), and Huntington’s disease (HD) are late-onset autosomal-dominant disorders characterized by the presence of intranuclear inclusions (INIs). We have previously identified the OPMD causative mutation as a small expansion (from 2 in normal to 7 in disease) of a GCG repeat tract in the PABPN1 gene. In addition, -1 ribosomal frameshifting has been reported to occur in expanded CAG repeat tracts in the ATXN3 (SCA3) and HTT (HD) genes, resulting in the translation of a hybrid CAG/GCA repeat tract and the production of a polyalanine-containing peptide. Previous studies on OPMD suggest that polyalanine-induced toxicity is very sensitive to the dosage and length of the alanine stretch. Here we report the characterization of a polyclonal antibody that selectively recognizes pathological expansions of polyalanine in PABPN1. Furthermore, our antibody also detects the presence of alanine proteins in INIs of SCA3 and HD patient samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".