EEG coupling features: Towards mental workload measurement based on wearables
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Automated mental workload measurement is particularly important in safety-critical settings, such as in nuclear plants, aviation, air traffic control, shipping, and transportation, to name a few. As an example, recent statistics have suggested that 90% of the accidents in the transport industry are due to human factors. In this paper, we explore the potential of off-the-shelf wearable technologies in monitoring mental workload in real-time, thus potentially reducing the number of accidents due to human errors. Wearable technologies, while providing the user with ease-of-use, comfort, and portability, have several limitations, such as lower quality signal readings (e.g., due to dry electrodes) and smaller number of recording sites. Such limitations place a burden on the accuracy of existing mental workload models. To overcome this limitation, we propose the use of phase-amplitude and amplitude-amplitude coupling features computed from a portable commercial electroencephalography (EEG) device. Experiments with three different tasks, namely N-back, mental rotation and visual search, show the proposed features being significantly correlated with multiple dimensions of the widely-used NASA task load index test and providing complementary information to other conventional features.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".