MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774922572 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2017.8216774

Control of series connected VSC modules for UHVDC application

2017· article· en· W2774922572 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaofan Fu, Louis‐A. Dessaint, Alireza Javadi, Luc-André Grégoire, Kamal Al‐Haddad, Boon‐Teck Ooi

Bibliographic record

VenueIECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityOpal-Rt Technologies (Canada)École de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltage sourceVoltageSeries (stratigraphy)Compensation (psychology)Series and parallel circuitsAC powerPower (physics)Control theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceElectronic engineeringControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As HVDC based on voltage source converter (VSC) technology has already reached 350 kVdc voltage level, this paper examines the feasibility of connecting four voltage source converter (VSC) modules, each rated at 200 kVdc, in series to form a pole of UHVDC rated at 800 kVdc. Due to the series connection layouts, the individual DC bus voltage inequality exists when power reversal occurs. A detailed control solution with DC voltage compensation equalizer for the series connected VSC-UHVDC system is developed and presented. The operation feasibility of the proposed UHVDC system is verified via simulation studies under different conditions such as active power step changes, reactive power step changes, and power reversal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics SocietySame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207