MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2774929555 · doi:10.1097/mph.0000000000001032

Sustained Response to Targeted Therapy in a Patient With Disseminated Anaplastic Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma

2017· article· en· W2774929555 on OpenAlexaff
Nisreen Amayiri, Maisa Swaidan, Maysa Al‐Hussaini, Hadeel Halalsheh, Anwar Al-Nassan, Awni Musharbash, Uri Tabori, Cynthia Hawkins, Éric Bouffet

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPleomorphic xanthoastrocytomaMedicineTrametinibRadiation therapyDabrafenibTargeted therapyChemotherapyMEK inhibitorAnaplastic astrocytomaOncologyVemurafenibPathologyInternal medicineGliomaCancer researchAstrocytomaCancerMAPK/ERK pathwaySignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma is a rare brain tumor with unique high frequency of BRAF V600E mutation which is plausible for targeted therapy. The anaplastic variant has generally worse prognosis. We present an adolescent patient with a disseminated relapse of anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma following surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. She had a dramatic and prolonged response to a BRAF inhibitor (Dabrafinib) and later to addition of a MEK inhibitor (Trametinib) on tumor progression. With minimal side effects and a good quality of life, the patient is alive more than 2 years after initiation of targeted therapy. This experience confirms the potential role of targeted treatments in high-grade BRAF-mutated brain tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric Hematology/OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207