Metaphors in Wine-tasting Notes in English and Spanish
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La metáfora conceptual, para la lingüística cognitiva, implica entender un dominio semántico en términos de otro. A menudo se ha considerado que las asociaciones conceptuales son universales, unidireccionales y dependientes del uso. Sin embargo, el concepto de universalidad es muy controvertido ya que enfrenta dos conceptos, el de universalidad y el de cultura; es decir, diferentes culturas pueden transmitir la misma realidad usando diferentes recursos metafóricos. El objetivo de este artículo es comprobar el concepto de universalidad en el lenguaje metafórico de fichas de cata escritas por expertos. Nuestra metodología implica la identificación de las metáforas de acuerdo con determinados términos clave y su posterior análisis en términos cualitativos y cuantitativos. Nuestros resultados demuestran que las diferencias entre las culturas implicadas no parecen afectar al uso metafórico en las fichas de cata.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it