Mineralogy and genesis of the Ni–Co lateritic regolith deposit of the Çaldağ area (Manisa, western Anatolia), Turkey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Çaldağ Ni–Co deposit is characterized by a reddish brown oxide lateritic regolith, containing residual Ni deposit formed by the intense tropical weathering of peridotites. Nickel–Co ore is associated with transported ferricrete during the late Paleocene – middle Eocene, represented by colloform Fe oxides and residual lateritization during the Oligocene. The lateritic regoliths are developed over dunitic ultramafic rocks and consist mainly of smectite, berthierine, kaolinite, gypsum, pyrite, takovite, and pecoraite. These units were examined using polarized-light microscopy, X-ray diffraction, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, and geochemical methods. Mineralogical zonation from the base of the profile upwards has the following zones: ultramafic bedrocks, serpentinized ultramafic rocks (saprock), saprolite, carbonate- and sulfide-bearing zone, ferruginous saprolite zone, and silcrete. In addition, Fe oxides, smectite and opal-CT, and quartz increase towards the surface, whereas olivine, pyroxene, and serpentine decrease upwards in response to chemical weathering. Nickel–Co mineralization associated with Fe oxides and smectitic clays formed under wet and dry conditions, respectively, as a result of an increased Fe2O3 + Al2O3 + Ni + Co/MgO ratio. Field observations and mineralogical and geochemical analyses reveal that the smectite formed under basic conditions was controlled by multistage chemical weathering of ultramafic and volcanic rocks and by the concentrations of Si, Al, Fe, and Mg. Locally, concentrations of S in conjunction with Fe and Ca resulted in precipitation of goethite–hematite, gypsum, and pyrite in dissolution voids in association with smectite under acidic conditions that developed in a well-drained system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".