MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2775142936 · doi:10.26798/jiko.2017.v2i1.53

REKAYASA PROSES BISNIS PADA E-COMMERCE B2B–B2C MENGGUNAKAN SISTEM AFILIASI

2017· article· en· W2775142936 on OpenAlexaff
Febri Nova Lenti

Bibliographic record

VenueJIKO (Jurnal Informatika dan Komputer) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Retrieval and Data Mining
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessCommerceRevenueE-commerceGoods and servicesThe InternetMobile commerceMarketingComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

E-commerce B2B-B2C is a kind of E-commerce with forms of interaction Bussiness to Bussiness (B2B) and Bussiness to Customer (B2C) where there is interaction between producers (company, home industries, providers of goods and services) with distributors and retailers, which followed by distributors and retailers to consumers based on electronic media that is connected to the internet. The system is engineered using Affiliate System where the activity in these systems sell products or services of another person without having to buy or have products or services. The affiliate system uses a system of revenue sharing or commission in accordance with the agreement. How affiliate system can support B2B-B2C interactions as well as the application of information and communication technology appropriate to support business processes will be explorated in this research. Results to be obtained from this research is an E-commerce system that provides ease of process to support an information system of selling based on mobile and web from providers of goods and services to retailer and from the retailer to the consumer.Keywords:E -Commerce, Business Process, B2B, B2C, Afiliate, provider of goods, retailers, consumers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJIKO (Jurnal Informatika dan Komputer)Same topicInformation Retrieval and Data MiningFrench-language works237,207