Entre incomplétude institutionnelle et mobilisation sociale : le cas de la langue basque en France
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Pays basque de France est classiquement présenté comme un cas d’institutionnalisation faible de l’identité basque au regard de ses voisins du Sud. Néanmoins, le changement de gouvernance qu’a expérimenté ce territoire depuis les années 1990 a initié un processus d’institutionnalisation d’une politique publique de la langue et de la culture basques. L’apparente immuabilité du régime linguistique français n’a pas empêché les arrangements institutionnels locaux. Le mouvement social linguistique a travaillé à la complétude institutionnelle des bascophones d’abord par le biais de l’auto-organisation puis en plaçant l’enjeu linguistique sur l’agenda des politiques publiques territoriales. Le changement institutionnel de type incrémental ou graduel qui s’est produit a abouti à un régime linguistique intermédiaire sur ce territoire. La communauté bascophone continue cependant d’être dans une situation d’incomplétude institutionnelle porteuse d’incertitudes pour l’avenir de la langue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".