Interroger Ricœur et les sciences cognitives pour enrichir les pratiques d’éducation morale
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les travaux empiriques des dernières décennies en sciences cognitives et en psychologie morale ont permis d’identifier des processus qui s’enclenchent automatiquement et qui ont un effet direct et instantané sur le comportement humain et sur le jugement moral. Ce discours constitue un défi pour les démarches d’éducation morale qui proposent des apprentissages qui font surtout appel à des processus conscients. On trouve chez Paul Ricœur une phénoménologie du volontaire et de l’involontaire ainsi qu’une phénoménologie de l’homme capable qui peuvent aider les éducateurs à relever ce défi. En prenant appui non seulement sur la théorie de Ricœur sur l’attestation de la capacité éthique mais aussi sur deux modélisations issues de la recherche empirique en sciences cognitives et en psychologie morale, il devient possible de proposer de nouvelles stratégies pour enrichir les pratiques d’éducation morale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it