MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2775216768 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.171389

Health services research: a special <i>CMAJ</i> focus

2017· editorial· en· W2775216768 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kirsten Patrick, Muhammad Mamdani, Matthew B. Stanbrook, Diane Kelsall

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2017
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFocus (optics)Computer scienceData scienceWorld Wide WebMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada spends over $240 billion annually (more than 10% of our gross domestic product) on health. Yet no one is going to get the right health interventions at the right time if the services that provide them are poorly organized. Our health care system is based on our health professionals, the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.072
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.072
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.006
Bibliometrics0.0080.006
Science and technology studies0.0080.008
Scholarly communication0.0210.009
Open science0.0080.003
Research integrity0.0310.047
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Same topicHealth and Medical Research Impacts→French-language works237,207→