Regulación en responsabilidad social empresarial en la hotelería de Colombia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Actualmente, el turismo y particularmente la hotelería representan un sector que muestra un comportamiento dinámico en Colombia y el mundo. Esto se ha evidenciado en el incremento de los gastos derivados del turismo receptivo; sin embargo, esta dinámica de crecimiento no se ha equiparado con la asunción de acciones de responsabilidad social empresarial (RSE) por parte de los hoteles.Además, en los últimos años han venido apareciendo iniciativas regulativas que pretenden guiar el comportamiento de los hoteles y otro tipo de organizaciones en este sentido. Por ende, este artículo busca contribuir a la reflexión en cuanto a la RSE de los hoteles en Colombia, para lo cual se evidencian los resultados de una investigación cualitativa a partir del método de estudio de caso que caracterizó comparativamente de manera sintética las principales iniciativas regulativas y posteriormente desarrolló un análisis crítico a partir del análisis del discurso y la perspectiva de la Escuela de Montreal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".