Domination et servitude dans le Brésil rural contemporain : le « travail esclave » rural migrant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se propose d’analyser le phénomène du « travail esclave » rural migrant apparu au Brésil depuis les années soixante. Pour ce faire, il part du discours de travailleurs ruraux libérés d’une situation de « travail esclave » pour montrer les différents aspects qui caractérisent la relation de domination du « travail esclave » rural migrant (tromperie, dette économique et dépersonnalisation). Il s’agira de penser, en la mettant en perspective avec d’autres formes traditionnelles de domination en milieu rural, la spécificité et l’historicité du « travail esclave ». On montrera ensuite comment le « travail esclave » constitue un « mode d’exploitation » et une relation de servitude en termes d’excès de domination dépassant la relation de dette économique et impliquant un rapport aux droits et à la citoyenneté symbolique. Enfin, on élargira la réflexion au contexte global de l’économie capitaliste en montrant comment l’analyse du « travail esclave » rural migrant peut contribuer aux réflexions sur l’esclavage contemporain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".