MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2775347426 · doi:10.1113/ep086694

Type 2 diabetes specifically attenuates purinergic skin vasodilatation without affecting muscarinic and nicotinic skin vasodilatation and sweating

2017· article· en· W2775347426 on OpenAlexafffund
Naoto Fujii, Robert D. Meade, Brendan D. McNeely, Takeshi Nishiyasu, Ronald J. Sigal, Glen P. Kenny

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMethacholineMedicineVasodilationEndocrinologyMuscarinic acetylcholine receptorAgonistNicotinic agonistInternal medicinePurinergic receptorPharmacologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? It remains to be determined whether type 2 diabetes attenuates muscarinic and nicotinic cutaneous vasodilatation and sweating as well as purinergic cutaneous vasodilatation. What is the main finding and its importance? We show that type 2 diabetes specifically attenuates purinergic cutaneous vasodilatation without influencing muscarinic and nicotinic cutaneous vasodilatation and sweating. Our results provide valuable new information regarding the receptor-specific influence of type 2 diabetes on microvascular and sudomotor function. ABSTRACT: The present study evaluated whether type 2 diabetes (T2D) attenuates muscarinic and/or nicotinic cutaneous vasodilatation and sweating as well as purinergic cutaneous vasodilatation. Cutaneous vascular conductance and sweat rate were evaluated in 12 healthy non-diabetic older adults (Control, 60 ± 8 years) and 13 older adults with T2D (62 ± 10 years) at three intradermal forearm skin sites perfused with the following: (i) methacholine (muscarinic receptor agonist, five doses: 0.0125, 0.25, 5, 100 and 2000 mm); (ii) nicotine (nicotinic receptor agonist, five doses: 1.2, 3.6, 11, 33 and 100 mm); or (iii) ATP (purinergic receptor agonist, five doses: 0.03, 0.3, 3, 30 and 300 mm). Each agonist was administered for 25 min per dose. At the end of the protocol, 50 mm sodium nitroprusside was administered to all skin sites to elicit maximal cutaneous vasodilatation. Cutaneous vascular conductance during methacholine and nicotine administration did not differ between groups (all P > 0.05). In contrast, cutaneous vascular conductance during administration of 30 mm (42 ± 28 versus 63 ± 26% maximum, P ≤ 0.05) and 300 mm ATP (56 ± 24 versus 71 ± 20% maximum, P ≤ 0.05) was attenuated in individuals with T2D in comparison to the Control participants. Furthermore, cutaneous vascular conductance during administration of 50 mm sodium nitroprusside was lower in individuals with T2D relative to Control subjects (P = 0.04). Methacholine- and nicotine-induced sweating was similar between groups (all P > 0.05). Thus, T2D attenuates purinergic cutaneous vasodilatation without affecting muscarinic and nicotinic cutaneous vascular and sweating responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental PhysiologySame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207