La patrimonialisation au Quebec : ethnographie d’un milieu associatif dedie a la musique traditionnelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce mémoire interroge la notion de patrimoine culturel immatériel, dont l’UNESCO a proposé une définition normative et qui désigne « [des] traditions ou [des] expressions vivantes héritées de nos ancêtres et transmises à nos descendants » (UNESCO, 2003c). Il propose une exploration des modalités contemporaines de la patrimonialisation musicale. Réalisé dans la foulée d’une démarche ethnographique multisite (Marcus, 1995), qui s’est amorcée en juillet 2015 dans le cadre du festival Mémoire et Racines (Saint-Charles-Borromée, Lanaudière), il considère l’articulation entre patrimoine et musique traditionnelle du Québec comme problématique. Alors que le Conseil québécois du patrimoine vivant (CQPV) accorde un statut patrimonial à la musique traditionnelle et en promeut la dimension de « richesse collective », le mémoire met l’accent sur ce qui informe sa constitution, son déploiement. Il cherche à en expliciter les enjeux sur la base d’un travail empirique et en vertu d’un point de vue pragmatique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".