Accumulated Angle Factor-Based Beamforming to Improve the Visualization of Spinal Structures in Ultrasound Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, ultrasound has been increasingly used to guide needle insertion procedures for spinal anesthesia. The primary anatomical targets are facet joints and epidural spaces. For these procedures, accurate visualization of the spine anatomy is of critical importance. Challenges arising from the interactions between the ultrasound beam and spinal structures including tilt caused by specular reflections, off-axis interference, and reverberations often result in weakened and blurred vertebra surfaces. Previously, adaptive beamforming methods have been proposed to improve the resolution and contrast. However, most of these methods are not specialized for improving the contrast of specular targets like bones. In this paper, we propose an accumulated angle factor (AAF)-based beamforming method customized for bone surface enhancement. This approach applies a Hilbert transform on delay compensated channel data across the receive aperture. The accumulated phase change across the receive aperture is then calculated and utilized as the weight in the beamforming output. We compared our method with classical delay and sum (DAS) beamforming method and adaptive beamforming methods such as Wiener, phase coherence factor (PCF), CF, and generalized CF (GCF) beamforming. In 12 volunteer data sets, the mean contrast ratio between the vertebrae surface and the surrounding tissue for DAS, Wiener, PCF, CF, GCF, and the proposed AAF methods are 0.49, 0.64, 0.82, 0.77, 0.76, and 0.91, respectively. The contrast is significantly improved in the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".