MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2775452007 · doi:10.15353/vsnl.v3i1.174

Foot Depth Map Point Cloud Completion using Deep Learning with Residual Blocks

2017· article· en· W2775452007 on OpenAlex
Nolan Lunscher, John Zelek

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Vision and Imaging Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoint cloudResidualComputer science3d scanningFoot (prosody)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionPoint (geometry)Object (grammar)MathematicsAlgorithmGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fit is extremely important in footwear as fit largely determines performanceand comfort. Current footwear fit estimation mainly usesonly shoe size, which is extremely limited in characterizing theshape of a foot or the shape of a shoe. 3D scanning presents asolution to this, where a foot shape can be captured and virtuallyfit with shoe models. Traditional 3D scanning techniques have theirown complications however, stemming from their need to collectviews covering all aspects of an object. In this work we explore adeep learning technique to compete a foot scan point cloud frominformation contained in a single depth map view. We examine thebenefits of implementing residual blocks in architectures for this application,and find that they can improve accuracies while reducingmodel size and training time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it