MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2775467933

The integer-magic spectra and null sets of the cartesian product of trees

2018· article· en· W2775467933 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHKBU Institutional Repository (Hong Kong Baptist University) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGraph Labeling and Dimension Problems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCartesian productMathematicsCombinatoricsInteger (computer science)MAGIC (telescope)Null (SQL)Product (mathematics)Discrete mathematicsComputer scienceGeometryPhysicsData mining
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let A be a non-trivial, finitely-generated abelian group and A * = A\{0}.A graph is A-magic if there exists an edge labeling f using elements of A * which induces a constant vertex labeling of the graph.Such a labeling f is called an A-magic labeling and the constant value of the induced vertex labeling is called the A-magic value.The integer-magic spectrum of a graph G is the setwhere N is the set of natural numbers.The null set of G is the set of integers k N such that G has a Z k -magic labeling with magic value 0. In this paper, we determine the integer-magic spectra and null sets of the Cartesian product of two trees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it