MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2775496928

Phylogeny of Dalytyphloplanida (Platyhelminthes: Rhabdocoela): single escape from the marine environment?

2017· dissertation· en· W2775496928 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Niels W. L. Van Steenkiste

Bibliographic record

VenueDocument Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlanarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPhylogeneticsTurbellariaZoologyFlatwormEcologyGeographyEvolutionary biology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flatworms (Platyhelminthes) traditionally consist of the paraphyletic “turbellaria”\nand the parasitic Neodermata. The last two decades, molecular phylogenetic\nresearch has completely altered our views of flatworm systematics. However,\nphylogenetic relations within many turbellarian groups are far from understood.\nIn terms of species numbers, Rhabdocoela (± 1500 species) is one of the largest\nturbellarian taxa. Former studies on rhabdocoel relationships based on\nmorphological and molecular data have given new insights into the evolutionary\nhistory of this cosmopolitan and important meiofaunal taxon (Willems et al.\n2006). Rhabdocoels now consist of two monophyletic sistertaxa:\nKalyptorhynchia (± 500 species) and Dalytyphloplanida (± 1000 species), the\nlatter clade comprising all former “Typhloplanoida”, “Dalyellioida” and\nTemnocephalida interspersed throughout the phylogeny. Consequently, a\nnumber of new clades quite different from the traditional rhabdocoel taxa have\nbeen defined. For instance, the existence of a monophyletic freshwater clade,\ncomprising the bulk of the limnic dalytyphloplanids (Dalyelliidae, Typhloplanidae,\nTemnocephalida) was considered, suggesting a single invasion of the freshwater\nenvironment by a marine ancestor that was followed by a spectacular radiation.\nHowever, this could not be corroborated, because few taxa were used in these\nstudies and molecular analyses were based on 18S rDNA only. In addition, the\nphylogenetic position of some symbiotic Dalytyphloplanida also triggered new\nquestions on the origins of commensalism and eventually parasitism within freeliving flatworms.\nIn this study I try to address these questions by elaborating the\nphylogeny of Dalytyphloplanida including more taxa and using a widened\nmolecular approach. During the coarse of this work, dalytyphloplanids have been\nsampled in nearly all major zoogeographical regions (Palearctic, Nearctic,\nAfrotropics, Neotropics, Oriental, Australian, Pacific). Many of the collected taxa\nappeared to be new to science and a number of them have been formally\ndescribed in five !-taxonomical papers: (1) an overview of the marine\nrhabdocoels from Uruguay, with the description of two new genera and six new\nspecies, (2) the description and ecology of a new limnoterrestrial representative\nof Protoplanellinae from Alabama (USA), (3) an account of the Dalytyphloplanida\nfrom Andalusia (Spain), with the description of four new species, (4) the\ndescription of one new genus of Dalyelliidae and one new species of Gieysztoria\nfrom Alabama (USA), together with an overview of all other dalyelliid representatives collected in Ontario (Canada), and Michigan and Alabama (USA),\n(5) the erection of a new species group of Gieysztoria, the “Falcatae”, based on\na comparative morphological study and the description of five new species from\nIndia, South Africa and Australia. After DNA extraction, amplification and\nsequencing, ribosomal DNA datasets of 156 18S rDNA and 125 partial 28S rDNA\ndalytyphloplanid sequences were aligned and analysed as individual genes and\nas a concatenated dataset in a maximum likelihood and Bayesian framework.\nTwo kalyptorhynch rhabdocoels were used as outgroup.\nThe previously found new dalytyphloplanid clades, i.e. Neotyphloplanida,\nNeodalyellida and Thalassotyphloplanida, are confirmed in our topologies as\nmonophyletic assemblages. Many of the traditional non-kalyptorhynch\nrhabdocoel families are not monophyletic (Trigonostomidae, Promesostomidae,\nByrsophlebidae, Typhloplanidae, Dalyelliidae, Provorticidae, Graffillidae). In\naddition, alternative hypothesis testing constraining these families in the\ntopologies and using the approximately unbiased test, also statistically rejects\nthe monophyly of these families. The enigmatic Kytorhynchidae are most likely\nbasal thalassotyphloplanids. Our phylogenies indicate that dalytyphloplanids\nhave their origins in the marine environment, but were able to massively\ncolonise a wide range of limnic and limnoterrestrial habitats, when a\nneotyphloplanid ancestor escaped its marine environment. The 18S and\ncombined phylogenies clearly support the existence of a large, species-rich,\nmonophyletic freshwater clade, Limnotyphloplanida n.c., comprising Dalyelliidae,\nTemnocephalida and most Typhloplanidae. Moreover, Temnocephalida can be\nconsidered ectosymbiotic Dalyelliidae as they are embedded within this group.\nAdditionally, some thalassotyphloplanids and neodalyellids also invaded limnic\nenvironments, albeit very sporadically and not followed by spectacular\nspeciation events as in Limnotyphloplanida n.c. Secondary returns to brackish\nwater and marine environments occurred relatively frequently in several\ndalyeliid and typhloplanid taxa. The distinct phylogenetic positions of some\nsymbiotic taxa (Umagillidae, Pterastericolidae, Graffillidae, Temnocephalida) also\nconfirm multiple origins for commensal and parasitic life strategies within\nDalytyphloplanida.\nThe above-mentioned results are thoroughly discussed in an ecological\nand taxonomical context. Finally, these phylogenies undoubtedly evoke much\nmore questions regarding the evolutionary history of this group. Some future\nconsiderations and possible research topics are briefly mentioned in the end.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDocument Server@UHasselt (UHasselt)Same topicPlanarian Biology and ElectrostimulationFrench-language works237,207