Phylogeny of Dalytyphloplanida (Platyhelminthes: Rhabdocoela): single escape from the marine environment?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Flatworms (Platyhelminthes) traditionally consist of the paraphyletic “turbellaria”\nand the parasitic Neodermata. The last two decades, molecular phylogenetic\nresearch has completely altered our views of flatworm systematics. However,\nphylogenetic relations within many turbellarian groups are far from understood.\nIn terms of species numbers, Rhabdocoela (± 1500 species) is one of the largest\nturbellarian taxa. Former studies on rhabdocoel relationships based on\nmorphological and molecular data have given new insights into the evolutionary\nhistory of this cosmopolitan and important meiofaunal taxon (Willems et al.\n2006). Rhabdocoels now consist of two monophyletic sistertaxa:\nKalyptorhynchia (± 500 species) and Dalytyphloplanida (± 1000 species), the\nlatter clade comprising all former “Typhloplanoida”, “Dalyellioida” and\nTemnocephalida interspersed throughout the phylogeny. Consequently, a\nnumber of new clades quite different from the traditional rhabdocoel taxa have\nbeen defined. For instance, the existence of a monophyletic freshwater clade,\ncomprising the bulk of the limnic dalytyphloplanids (Dalyelliidae, Typhloplanidae,\nTemnocephalida) was considered, suggesting a single invasion of the freshwater\nenvironment by a marine ancestor that was followed by a spectacular radiation.\nHowever, this could not be corroborated, because few taxa were used in these\nstudies and molecular analyses were based on 18S rDNA only. In addition, the\nphylogenetic position of some symbiotic Dalytyphloplanida also triggered new\nquestions on the origins of commensalism and eventually parasitism within freeliving flatworms.\nIn this study I try to address these questions by elaborating the\nphylogeny of Dalytyphloplanida including more taxa and using a widened\nmolecular approach. During the coarse of this work, dalytyphloplanids have been\nsampled in nearly all major zoogeographical regions (Palearctic, Nearctic,\nAfrotropics, Neotropics, Oriental, Australian, Pacific). Many of the collected taxa\nappeared to be new to science and a number of them have been formally\ndescribed in five !-taxonomical papers: (1) an overview of the marine\nrhabdocoels from Uruguay, with the description of two new genera and six new\nspecies, (2) the description and ecology of a new limnoterrestrial representative\nof Protoplanellinae from Alabama (USA), (3) an account of the Dalytyphloplanida\nfrom Andalusia (Spain), with the description of four new species, (4) the\ndescription of one new genus of Dalyelliidae and one new species of Gieysztoria\nfrom Alabama (USA), together with an overview of all other dalyelliid representatives collected in Ontario (Canada), and Michigan and Alabama (USA),\n(5) the erection of a new species group of Gieysztoria, the “Falcatae”, based on\na comparative morphological study and the description of five new species from\nIndia, South Africa and Australia. After DNA extraction, amplification and\nsequencing, ribosomal DNA datasets of 156 18S rDNA and 125 partial 28S rDNA\ndalytyphloplanid sequences were aligned and analysed as individual genes and\nas a concatenated dataset in a maximum likelihood and Bayesian framework.\nTwo kalyptorhynch rhabdocoels were used as outgroup.\nThe previously found new dalytyphloplanid clades, i.e. Neotyphloplanida,\nNeodalyellida and Thalassotyphloplanida, are confirmed in our topologies as\nmonophyletic assemblages. Many of the traditional non-kalyptorhynch\nrhabdocoel families are not monophyletic (Trigonostomidae, Promesostomidae,\nByrsophlebidae, Typhloplanidae, Dalyelliidae, Provorticidae, Graffillidae). In\naddition, alternative hypothesis testing constraining these families in the\ntopologies and using the approximately unbiased test, also statistically rejects\nthe monophyly of these families. The enigmatic Kytorhynchidae are most likely\nbasal thalassotyphloplanids. Our phylogenies indicate that dalytyphloplanids\nhave their origins in the marine environment, but were able to massively\ncolonise a wide range of limnic and limnoterrestrial habitats, when a\nneotyphloplanid ancestor escaped its marine environment. The 18S and\ncombined phylogenies clearly support the existence of a large, species-rich,\nmonophyletic freshwater clade, Limnotyphloplanida n.c., comprising Dalyelliidae,\nTemnocephalida and most Typhloplanidae. Moreover, Temnocephalida can be\nconsidered ectosymbiotic Dalyelliidae as they are embedded within this group.\nAdditionally, some thalassotyphloplanids and neodalyellids also invaded limnic\nenvironments, albeit very sporadically and not followed by spectacular\nspeciation events as in Limnotyphloplanida n.c. Secondary returns to brackish\nwater and marine environments occurred relatively frequently in several\ndalyeliid and typhloplanid taxa. The distinct phylogenetic positions of some\nsymbiotic taxa (Umagillidae, Pterastericolidae, Graffillidae, Temnocephalida) also\nconfirm multiple origins for commensal and parasitic life strategies within\nDalytyphloplanida.\nThe above-mentioned results are thoroughly discussed in an ecological\nand taxonomical context. Finally, these phylogenies undoubtedly evoke much\nmore questions regarding the evolutionary history of this group. Some future\nconsiderations and possible research topics are briefly mentioned in the end.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».