MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mythical Homes and Violent Realities: Reading Gujarat in M. G. Vassanji's<i>A Place Within</i>

2015· article· en· W2775668633 on OpenAlexaff
Asma Sayed

Bibliographic record

VenueSouth Asian Review · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemoirHomelandVisionReading (process)Subject (documents)PoliticsDiasporaSociologyHistoryAestheticsMedia studiesGender studiesArtArt historyAnthropologyPolitical scienceLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this essay, I read M. G. Vassanji's travel-memoir A Place Within: Rediscovering India, as a diasporic traveler's personal journey and search for the self, and as a political critique of postcolonial India. I argue that as Vassanji, a diasporic traveler removed from his original homeland by many generations and geographies, searches for his roots seeking affirmation of his mythical memory, and as he tries to come to terms with the differences between the imagined and the real Gujarat, he represents the angst of the diasporic subject. Finally, this paper explores how Vassanji uses the travelogue not only as a way of recording his cultural memory, but as a means of challenging simplified visions of India's past.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSouth Asian ReviewSame topicTravel Writing and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207