MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AltitudeOmics: effect of reduced barometric pressure on detection of intrapulmonary shunt, pulmonary gas exchange efficiency, and total pulmonary resistance

2018· article· en· W2775796024 on OpenAlexaff
Frank A. Petrassi, James Davis, Kara M. Beasley, Oghenero Evero, Jonathan E. Elliott, Randall D. Goodman, Joel E. Futral, Andrew W. Subudhi, J. Manuel Solano-Altamirano, Saul Goldman, Robert C. Roach, Andrew T. Lovering

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institutes of HealthU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsPulmonary arteryCardiac outputShunt (medical)ChemistryHypoxia (environmental)CardiologyRespiratory systemInternal medicineAnesthesiaOxygenHemodynamicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blood flow through intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomoses (Q IPAVA ) occurs in healthy humans at rest and during exercise when breathing hypoxic gas mixtures at sea level and may be a source of right-to-left shunt. However, at high altitudes, Q IPAVA is reduced compared with sea level, as detected using transthoracic saline contrast echocardiography (TTSCE). It remains unknown whether the reduction in Q IPAVA (i.e., lower bubble scores) at high altitude is due to a reduction in bubble stability resulting from the lower barometric pressure (P B ) or represents an actual reduction in Q IPAVA . To this end, Q IPAVA , pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), cardiac output (Q T ), and the alveolar-to-arterial oxygen difference (AaDO 2 ) were assessed at rest and during exercise (70–190 W) in the field (5,260 m) and in the laboratory (1,668 m) during four conditions: normobaric normoxia (NN; [Formula: see text] = 121 mmHg, P B = 625 mmHg; n = 8), normobaric hypoxia (NH; [Formula: see text] = 76 mmHg, P B = 625 mmHg; n = 7), hypobaric normoxia (HN; [Formula: see text] = 121 mmHg, P B = 410 mmHg; n = 8), and hypobaric hypoxia (HH; [Formula: see text] = 75 mmHg, P B = 410 mmHg; n = 7). We hypothesized Q IPAVA would be reduced during exercise in isooxic hypobaria compared with normobaria and that the AaDO 2 would be reduced in isooxic hypobaria compared with normobaria. Bubble scores were greater in normobaric conditions, but the AaDO 2 was similar in both isooxic hypobaria and normobaria. Total pulmonary resistance (PASP/Q T ) was elevated in HN and HH. Using mathematical modeling, we found no effect of hypobaria on bubble dissolution time within the pulmonary transit times under consideration (<5 s). Consequently, our data suggest an effect of hypobaria alone on pulmonary blood flow. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Blood flow through intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomoses, detected by transthoracic saline contrast echocardiography, was reduced during exercise in acute hypobaria compared with normobaria, independent of oxygen tension, whereas pulmonary gas exchange efficiency was unaffected. Modeling the effect(s) of reduced air density on contrast bubble lifetime did not result in a significantly reduced contrast stability. Interestingly, total pulmonary resistance was increased by hypobaria, independent of oxygen tension, suggesting that pulmonary blood flow may be changed by hypobaria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysiologySame topicCardiovascular and Diving-Related ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207