Analysis of instantaneous availability of communication system based on the influence of support equipment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Taking into account the influence of support equipment, in this paper, we propose an instantaneous availability (IA) model based on the Markov process and queuing theory. Using big data technique, we analyze the massive data of a communication system and generate its main features. We propose a new method to design system, by using these features in the proposed IA model. Two typical fault modes in communication system are studied. Firstly, an IA model considering repair equipment failure in the maintenance of one electronic unit is proposed. Then, we further enhance the IA model by exploring the queuing problem of multiple electronic units. M/G/1 queuing system is used to analyze the distribution function of waiting and service time. Simulations are performed to illustrate the validity of the model when parameters are under exponential distribution. In addition, we investigate the effect of parameters on IA. As a case study, we analyze the proposed IA model on an optical fiber transmission system and show the validity and applicability of the model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it