MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2775972986 · doi:10.1002/itl2.25

Anonymous Group Message Authentication Protocol for LTE‐based V2X Communications

2017· article· en· W2775972986 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Technology Letters · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceProtocol (science)Authentication (law)Authentication protocolStandardizationCommunication in small groupsLTE AdvancedComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cellular technologies, in particular the current long‐term evolution (LTE) and future 5G, are suitable for implementing vehicle‐to‐everything (V2X) services, due to the existing network infrastructure, device‐to‐device (D2D) communication capability, and guaranteed end‐to‐end delay. In LTE‐based V2X (LTE‐V), vehicle grouping plays an important role for improving LTE spectrum utilization and providing group‐oriented proximity‐based services (ProSe). However, the flourishing of LTE‐V group communications introduces unique privacy challenges. In this letter, the state‐of‐art standardization and research efforts are first reviewed, and their limitations are identified on achieving trajectory privacy for LTE‐V group communications. Then, an efficient and anonymous group message authentication protocol is proposed to support message batch verification. Security analysis and performance evaluation demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed protocol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.885

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it