Da Reforma histórica à "Reforma Digital": desafios teológicos contemporâneos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo situa sua reflexão em um contexto de midiatização digital, em que igrejas e sociedades, em geral, encontram-se marcadas por novas possibilidades de construção social de sentido. O texto analisa os desafi os apresentados pelas atuais mudanças comunicacionais ao pensamento teológico contemporâneo, a partir do conceito de “Reforma digital” como contrapartida presente à revolução teológica ocorrida na Reforma histórica. Nesse processo, identifica alguns desafios ao saber teológico, especialmente em termos de loci teológicos, sujeitos teológicos e sínteses teológicas possíveis hoje. Por fim, reflete e provoca a teologia para uma revisão de si como saber “aberto” que reconhece as novas manifestações de elementos teológicos no ambiente comunicacional contemporâneo e percebe a necessidade de problematizá-los e buscar dialogar criticamente com a cultura, entendendo-se como teologia conexial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".