Supernova Optimizer: A Novel Natural Inspired Meta-Heuristic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bio and natural phenomena inspired algorithms and meta-heuristics provide solutions to solve optimization and preliminary convergence problems. It significantly has wide effect that is integrated in many scientific fields. Thereby justifying the relevance development of many applications that relay on optimization algorithms, which allow finding the best solution in the shortest possible time. Therefore it is necessary to further consider and develop new swarm intelligence optimization algorithms. This paper proposes a novel optimization algorithm called supernova optimizer (SO) inspired by the supernova phenomena in nature. SO mimics this natural phenomena aiming to improve the three main features of optimization; exploration, exploitation, and local minima avoidance. The proposed meta-heuristic optimizer has been tested over 20 will known benchmarks functions, the results have been verified by a comparative study with the state of art optimization algorithms Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), A Sine Cosine Algorithm for solving optimization problems (SCA), Multi-Verse Optimizer (MVO), Moth-flame optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm (MFO), The Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Polar Particle Swarm Optimizer (PLOARPSO) and with Particle Swarm Optimizer (PSO). The results showed that SO provided very competitive and effective results. It outperforms the best state-of-art algorithms that are compared to on the most of the tested benchmark functions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".