Multi-Hop Cooperative Caching in Social IoT Using Matching Theory
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is envisioned that the Internet of Things (IoT) will provide promising opportunities to users, manufacturers, and service providers with a wide applicability in many fields. By employing social networking and device-to-device (D2D) communications in the IoT, the resulting social IoT can potentially provide services more effectively and efficiently. This paper focuses on content sharing among smart objects (devices) in the social IoT with D2D-based cooperative coded caching. Generally, complete content items or coded fragments are allowed to be delivered via multi-hop cooperative D2D communications. First, aiming at maximizing the overall success rate of multi-hop-based content sharing, the interplay between coding parameter optimization and wireless resource allocation is investigated by considering both physical and social characteristics. Moreover, a Roth and Vande Vate-based distributed scheme is proposed to solve the dynamic matching problem between the content helpers and content requesters. Numerical results demonstrate that the proposed scheme can achieve a good tradeoff between system performance and computational complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it