MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Damian Grimshaw, Colette Fagan, Gail Hebson et Isabel Tavora (dir.), Making Work more Equal. A New Labour Market Segmentation Approach (2017), Manchester, Manchester University Press, 368 p.

2018· article· en· W2775999196 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Diane‐Gabrielle Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventions économiques · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité TÉLUQ
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFagan inspectionArt historyWork (physics)ArtSociologyVisual artsComputer scienceEngineeringSoftware engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet ouvrage collectif propose une revue des thories de la segmentation du march du travail, mais surtout des propositions pour une mise jour de ces thories, en s'inspirant de divers courants thoriques. Les auteurs sont pour plusieurs des personnes qui ont aliment les travaux du International Working Party on Labour Market Segmentation, un groupe qui tient des rencontres annuelles traitant de segmentation du march du travail, mais aussi d'ingalits de salaires, de conditions de travail, etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventions économiquesSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207