MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2776139465

Samenvatting van de NHG-standaard 'Acuut hoesten'

2012· article· nl· W2776139465 on OpenAlexaff
Lisette Verlee, Theo Verheij, Rogier Hopstaken, Jan M. Prins, P. Salomé, Patrick Bindels

Bibliographic record

VenueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldMedicine
TopicOtolaryngology and Infectious Diseases
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCroupDoxycyclinePneumoniaPediatricsAntibioticsAmoxicillinBronchitisIntensive care medicineInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coughing is usually caused by an uncomplicated respiratory tract infection for which antibiotics are not useful. Noscapine and codein are not advised. When the risk of complications is increased (because of age or relevant comorbidity), the decision to prescribe an antibiotic is based on the clinical presentation and any necessary additional investigations. Determination of the CRP value can assist in differentiating between pneumonia and a mild lower respiratory tract infection in moderately sick adults with several general and/or local symptoms. Patients with pneumonia should be prescribed antibiotics. Because of increasing resistance to doxycycline and macrolides, amoxicillin is the drug of first choice, and doxycycline of second choice. In the case of increased risk of severe pneumonia due to Coxiella burnetii (Q-fever) or Legionella, doxycycline remains first choice. In the case of whooping cough, additional investigation is advised if there are infants or third trimester pregnant women in the immediate environment. In moderately severe croup a single dose of glucocorticoids should be given; children with severe croup should be referred to a paediatrician

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)Same topicOtolaryngology and Infectious DiseasesFrench-language works237,207