MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2776166525 · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.7b01220

Electrochemical Desalination of Seawater and Hypersaline Brines with Coupled Electricity Storage

2017· article· en· W2776166525 on OpenAlexaff
Divyaraj Desai, Eugene S. Beh, Saroj Kumar Sahu, Vedasri Vedharathinam, Quentin Van Overmeere, Charles‐François de Lannoy, Arun Jose, A. R. Völkel, Jessy B. Rivest

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Energy Letters · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMembrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDesalinationBrineSeawaterPressure-retarded osmosisGeothermal desalinationOsmotic powerReverse osmosisEnvironmental scienceForward osmosisSalinityEnvironmental engineeringBattery (electricity)WastewaterMembraneChemical engineeringMaterials scienceChemistryEngineeringGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a zinc|ferricyanide hybrid flow battery that achieves extensive first-pass desalination while simultaneously supplying electrical energy (10 Wh/L). We demonstrate 85% salt removal from simulated seawater (35 g/L NaCl) and 86% from hypersaline brine (100 g/L NaCl), together with reversible battery operation over 100 h with high round-trip efficiency (84.8%). The system has a high operating voltage ( E 0 = +1.25 V), low specific energy consumption (2.11 Wh/L for 85% salt removal), and a desalination flux (4.7 mol/m 2 ·h) on par with that of reverse osmosis membranes. Salt removal was similarly effective at higher feed salinities, for which reverse osmosis becomes physically impossible because of the pressure required. The results have positive implications for regions that rely on desalination for their freshwater needs, especially where sea salinity is high. Alternatively, the battery may also be useful in minimal liquid discharge wastewater treatment if operated as a brine concentrator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations143
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Energy LettersSame topicMembrane-based Ion Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207